{"id":7622,"date":"2018-12-08T17:45:22","date_gmt":"2018-12-08T15:45:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/?p=7622"},"modified":"2018-12-09T19:32:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-09T17:32:30","slug":"stiinta-stagneaza-niciun-progres-de-la-inceputul-secolului-al-xx-lea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/","title":{"rendered":"\u0218tiin\u021ba stagneaz\u0103! De la \u00eenceputul secolului al XX-lea nu exist\u0103 niciun progres real"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\nAceasta este o tem\u0103 recurent\u0103 pe care Peat a abordat-o de multe ori \u00een articolele \u0219i interviurile sale, de\u0219i se concentreaz\u0103 de obicei pe frauda medical\u0103. Cu toate acestea, problema este \u00een esen\u021b\u0103 identic\u0103 \u00een aproape toate disciplinele \u0219tiin\u021bifice fundamentale. O mare parte a problemei pare s\u0103 fie institu\u021bionalizarea \u0219tiin\u021bei \u0219i a educa\u021biei (despre care Ivan Illich a scris, de asemenea, pe larg), precum \u0219i climatul autoritar vital pentru men\u021binerea status quo-ului \u0219i a sute de mii de cariere \u201e\u0219tiin\u021bifice\u201c. Cred c\u0103 ultima este probabil cea mai pernicioas\u0103 problem\u0103 - \u0219tiin\u021ba a devenit o carier\u0103, o industrie parazitar\u0103 dependent\u0103 de minciuni \u0219i huliganism pentru a supravie\u021bui \u0219i a cre\u0219te. Un cancer al min\u021bii, care distruge \u00eens\u0103\u0219i miezul civiliza\u021biei.<br>Cele dou\u0103 articole de mai jos trag un semnal de alarm\u0103 asem\u0103n\u0103tor. Ambele concluzioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 nu este probabil s\u0103 se schimbe mare lucru din cauza faptului c\u0103 finan\u021barea \u0219tiin\u021bific\u0103 este un cartof fierbinte din punct de vedere politic, pe care niciun politician nu este dispus s\u0103 \u00eel abordeze. \u00cen plus, industriile parazitare au primit control deplin asupra propriei lor soarte prin procesul de evaluare inter pares \u0219i prin definirea unor m\u0103suri de progres care sunt at\u00e2t de abstracte \u0219i prea matematice \u00eenc\u00e2t doar c\u00e2\u021biva \u201eini\u021bia\u021bi\u201c dintr-un domeniu \u0219tiin\u021bific pot depune m\u0103rturie cu privire la utilitatea lor. Ca atare, apelurile pentru mai multe finan\u021b\u0103ri devin din ce \u00een ce mai puternice, iar orice voce care solicit\u0103 rezultate reale este rapid respins\u0103 ca fiind fie o prostie de profan (dac\u0103 vine din exterior), fie instabilitate mintal\u0103, \u00eencetarea finan\u021b\u0103rii \u0219i excluderea din disciplin\u0103 (dac\u0103 vine din interior). Halton Arp \u0219i Peter Duesberg sunt dou\u0103 exemple excelente ale celor din urm\u0103. Vestea bun\u0103 este c\u0103 lipsa de rezultate condamn\u0103 \u00een cele din urm\u0103 orice domeniu \u0219i, \u00een cele din urm\u0103, acesta se pr\u0103bu\u0219e\u0219te sub propria greutate. Sper c\u0103, atunci c\u00e2nd va veni pr\u0103bu\u0219irea, publicul nu se va \u00eendep\u0103rta complet de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103, dezam\u0103git pe bun\u0103 dreptate de frauda masiv\u0103 care se \u00eentinde pe mai mult de un secol \u0219i care ucide milioane de oameni \u00een fiecare an din cauza \u201emedicilor\u201c.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/science\/archive\/2018\/11\/diminishing-returns-science\/575665\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Este \u0219tiin\u021ba stagnant\u0103? - The Atlantic<\/a><br>\u201e...Scriitorul Stewart Brand a scris odat\u0103 c\u0103 \u201c<strong>\u0219tiin\u021ba este singura \u0219tire<\/strong>.\u201d&nbsp;<strong>\u00cen timp ce titlurile \u0219tirilor sunt dominate de politic\u0103, economie \u0219i b\u00e2rfe, \u0219tiin\u021ba \u0219i tehnologia sunt cele care stau la baza majorit\u0103\u021bii progreselor \u00een bun\u0103starea uman\u0103 \u0219i a progresului pe termen lung al civiliza\u021biei noastre<\/strong>. Acest lucru este reflectat \u00eentr-o&nbsp;<strong>cre\u0219terea extraordinar\u0103 a investi\u021biilor publice \u00een \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103. \u00cen prezent, exist\u0103 mai mul\u021bi oameni de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103, mai multe fonduri pentru \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u0219i mai multe lucr\u0103ri \u0219tiin\u021bifice publicate dec\u00e2t oric\u00e2nd \u00eenainte<\/strong>Dar pentru toat\u0103 aceast\u0103 cre\u0219tere a efortului, ob\u021binem o cre\u0219tere propor\u021bional\u0103 a \u00een\u021belegerii noastre \u0219tiin\u021bifice? Sau&nbsp;<strong>investim mult mai mult doar pentru a men\u021bine (sau chiar pentru a asista la o sc\u0103dere) a ratei progresului \u0219tiin\u021bific<\/strong>?&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8222;&#8230;<strong>A urmat o epoc\u0103 de aur a fizicii, din anii 1910 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een anii 1930<\/strong>. Aceasta a fost perioada invent\u0103rii mecanicii cuantice, una dintre cele mai mari descoperiri \u0219tiin\u021bifice din toate timpurile, o descoperire care a schimbat radical \u00een\u021belegerea noastr\u0103 a realit\u0103\u021bii. De asemenea, au avut loc alte c\u00e2teva revolu\u021bii: inventarea cristalografiei cu raze X, care ne-a permis s\u0103 cercet\u0103m lumea atomic\u0103; descoperirea neutronului \u0219i a antimateriei; \u0219i descoperirea multor fapte fundamentale despre radioactivitate \u0219i for\u021bele nucleare. A fost una dintre cele mai mari perioade din istoria \u0219tiin\u021bei.&nbsp;<strong>Dup\u0103 aceast\u0103 perioad\u0103, a avut loc un declin substan\u021bial, cu o rena\u0219tere par\u021bial\u0103 \u00een anii 1960<\/strong>. Acest lucru s-a datorat a dou\u0103 descoperiri: radia\u021bia cosmic\u0103 de fond cu microunde \u0219i modelul standard al fizicii particulelor, cea mai bun\u0103 teorie a noastr\u0103 privind particulele \u0219i for\u021bele fundamentale care alc\u0103tuiesc universul.&nbsp;<strong>Chiar \u0219i cu aceste descoperiri, fizicienii au considerat fiecare deceniu din anii 1940 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een anii 1980 ca fiind mai r\u0103u dec\u00e2t cel mai r\u0103u deceniu din anii 1910 p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een anii 1930. Cele mai bune descoperiri din domeniul fizicii, judecate chiar de fizicieni, au devenit mai pu\u021bin importante<\/strong>.&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e...Graficul nostru se opre\u0219te la sf\u00e2r\u0219itul anilor 1980. Motivul este c\u0103&nbsp;<strong>\u00een ultimii ani, Comitetul Nobel a preferat s\u0103 acorde premii pentru lucr\u0103ri realizate \u00een anii '80 \u0219i '70. De fapt, doar trei descoperiri realizate \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu 1990 au fost recompensate cu premii Nobel<\/strong>. Acestea sunt prea pu\u021bine pentru a ob\u021bine o estimare de bun\u0103 calitate pentru anii 1990 \u0219i, prin urmare, nu am anchetat aceste premii. Cu toate acestea,&nbsp;<strong>raritatea premiilor acordate \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu 1990 este \u00een sine sugestiv\u0103<\/strong>. Anii 1990 \u0219i 2000 au distinc\u021bia dubioas\u0103 de a fi deceniile peste care Comitetul Nobel a preferat cel mai mult s\u0103 sar\u0103, acord\u00e2nd \u00een schimb premii pentru lucr\u0103ri anterioare. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 nici anii 1980 \u0219i 1970 nu arat\u0103 prea bine, aceasta este o veste proast\u0103 pentru fizic\u0103.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8222;&#8230;<strong>Chiar dac\u0103 fizica nu se descurc\u0103 at\u00e2t de bine, poate c\u0103 alte domenii se descurc\u0103 mai bine<\/strong>? Am efectuat sondaje similare pentru Premiul Nobel pentru chimie \u0219i Premiul Nobel pentru&nbsp;<strong>fiziologie sau medicin\u0103<\/strong>. Aici sunt scorurile:&nbsp;<strong>Rezultatele sunt pu\u021bin mai \u00eencurajatoare dec\u00e2t \u00een fizic\u0103, cu o mic\u0103 \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021bire \u00een a doua jum\u0103tate a secolului al XX-lea, dar aceasta este mic\u0103. Ca \u0219i \u00een fizic\u0103, anii 1990 \u0219i 2000 sunt omise, deoarece Comitetul Nobel a preferat cu prec\u0103dere lucr\u0103rile anterioare<\/strong>Au fost acordate mai pu\u021bine premii pentru munca depus\u0103 \u00een anii 1990 \u0219i 2000 dec\u00e2t \u00een orice perioad\u0103 similar\u0103 din deceniile anterioare.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8222;&#8230;<strong>Imaginea pe care o ofer\u0103 acest studiu este sumbr\u0103<\/strong>:&nbsp;<strong>\u00cen ultimul secol<\/strong>, am m\u0103rit considerabil timpul \u0219i banii investi\u021bi \u00een \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103, dar, dup\u0103 p\u0103rerea oamenilor de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103, producem cele mai importante descoperiri \u00eentr-un ritm aproape constant.&nbsp;<strong>Pe o baz\u0103 per dolar sau per persoan\u0103, acest lucru sugereaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021ba devine mult mai pu\u021bin eficient\u0103<\/strong>.&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8222;&#8230;<strong>Cre\u0219terea productivit\u0103\u021bii este un semn al unei societ\u0103\u021bi s\u0103n\u0103toase din punct de vedere economic<\/strong>, una care produce continuu idei care \u00eei \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021besc capacitatea de a genera bog\u0103\u021bie.&nbsp;<strong>Vestea proast\u0103 este c\u0103 cre\u0219terea productivit\u0103\u021bii \u00een SUA este \u00een sc\u0103dere. Aceasta a sc\u0103zut \u00eencep\u00e2nd cu anii 1950, c\u00e2nd era de aproximativ \u0219ase ori mai mare dec\u00e2t \u00een prezent<\/strong>.&nbsp;<strong>Acest lucru \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103, \u00een prezent, pe parcursul unui deceniu, asist\u0103m la tot at\u00e2tea schimb\u0103ri c\u00e2te au fost \u00een 18 luni \u00een anii 1950<\/strong>. Nu am asistat la multe inven\u021bii \u00een ultimele decenii? Nu este ast\u0103zi o epoc\u0103 de aur a schimb\u0103rilor tehnologice accelerate? Nu este a\u0219a, sus\u021bin economi\u0219tii Tyler Cowen \u0219i Robert Gordon. \u00cen c\u0103r\u021bile lor&nbsp;<em>Marea stagnare<\/em>&nbsp;\u0219i&nbsp;<em>Ascensiunea \u0219i dec\u0103derea cre\u0219terii economice americane<\/em>, ei subliniaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een prima parte a secolului al XX-lea au fost implementate pe scar\u0103 larg\u0103 multe tehnologii puternice de uz general: electricitatea, motorul cu combustie intern\u0103, radioul, telefoanele, transportul aerian, linia de asamblare, \u00eengr\u0103\u0219\u0103mintele \u0219i multe altele. \u00cen schimb, ei prezint\u0103 date economice care sugereaz\u0103 c\u0103&nbsp;<strong>lucrurile nu s-au schimbat la fel de mult din anii '70<\/strong>. Da, am \u00eenregistrat progrese asociate cu dou\u0103 tehnologii puternice de uz general: computerul \u0219i internetul, dar multe alte tehnologii s-au \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021bit doar progresiv.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e...Dar \u00een timp ce multe persoane \u0219i-au exprimat \u00eengrijorarea cu privire la diminuarea randamentului \u0219tiin\u021bei,&nbsp;<strong>a existat un r\u0103spuns institu\u021bional redus<\/strong>. Meteorologul Kelvin Droegemeier, actualul candidat la func\u021bia de consilier \u0219tiin\u021bific al pre\u0219edintelui Donald Trump, a afirmat \u00een 2016 c\u0103 \u201critmul descoperirilor se accelereaz\u0103\u201d, \u00een cadrul unei interven\u021bii \u00een fa\u021ba unei comisii a Senatului SUA.&nbsp;<strong>Problema randamentului descresc\u0103tor nu este men\u021bionat\u0103 nic\u0103ieri \u00een raportul din 2018 al Funda\u021biei Na\u021bionale pentru \u0218tiin\u021b\u0103, care vorbe\u0219te \u00een schimb cu optimism despre \u201ccercetarea poten\u021bial transformatoare care va genera descoperiri de pionierat \u0219i va avansa noi frontiere interesante \u00een \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103<\/strong>.Desigur, multe institu\u021bii \u0219tiin\u021bifice - \u00een special institu\u021biile noi - \u00ee\u0219i propun s\u0103 g\u0103seasc\u0103 modalit\u0103\u021bi \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021bite de func\u021bionare \u00een propriile domenii, dar acest lucru nu este acela\u0219i lucru cu un r\u0103spuns institu\u021bional organizat la randamentul descresc\u0103tor.&nbsp;<strong>Poate c\u0103 aceast\u0103 lips\u0103 de reac\u021bie se datoreaz\u0103 \u00een parte faptului c\u0103 unii oameni de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 consider\u0103 c\u0103 recunoa\u0219terea sc\u0103derii randamentului reprezint\u0103 o tr\u0103dare a interesului colectiv al oamenilor de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103. Majoritatea oamenilor de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 sunt \u00een favoarea unei finan\u021b\u0103ri mai mari a cercet\u0103rii. Le place s\u0103 prezinte \u0219tiin\u021ba \u00eentr-o lumin\u0103 pozitiv\u0103, subliniind beneficiile \u0219i minimaliz\u00e2nd aspectele negative. De\u0219i este de \u00een\u021beles, exist\u0103 dovezi c\u0103 \u0219tiin\u021ba a \u00eencetinit enorm pe dolar sau or\u0103 cheltuit\u0103. Aceste dovezi necesit\u0103 un r\u0103spuns institu\u021bional la scar\u0103 larg\u0103. Acesta ar trebui s\u0103 fie un subiect major \u00een politicile publice, precum \u0219i la agen\u021biile de granturi \u0219i universit\u0103\u021bi<\/strong>. O mai bun\u0103 \u00een\u021belegere a cauzei acestui fenomen este important\u0103, iar identificarea modalit\u0103\u021bilor de inversare a acestuia este una dintre cele mai mari oportunit\u0103\u021bi de a ne \u00eembun\u0103t\u0103\u021bi viitorul.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/backreaction.blogspot.com\/2018\/11\/the-present-phase-of-stagnation-in.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Backreaction: Faza actual\u0103 de stagnare \u00een bazele fizicii nu este normal\u0103<\/a><br>&#8222;&#8230;<strong>Nimic nu se mi\u0219c\u0103 \u00een bazele fizicii.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1708.06917\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Unu<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1810.10579\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">experiment<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1804.10697\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dup\u0103<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1804.10697\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">a<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1709.06371\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">altele<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1705.06655\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">se \u00eentoarce<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/journals.aps.org\/prl\/abstract\/10.1103\/PhysRevLett.120.141101\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rezultate nule<\/a>F\u0103r\u0103 particule noi, f\u0103r\u0103 dimensiuni noi, f\u0103r\u0103 simetrii noi<\/strong>. Sigur, exist\u0103 unele anomalii \u00een date&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/physicists-excited-by-latest-lhc-anomaly-1.21865\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">aici<\/a>&nbsp;\u0219i&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1809.09615\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">acolo<\/a>, \u0219i poate c\u0103 una dintre ele se va dovedi a fi o \u0219tire real\u0103. Dar experimentatorii nu fac dec\u00e2t s\u0103 scormoneasc\u0103 \u00een \u00eentuneric.&nbsp;<strong>Ei habar nu au unde ar putea fi g\u0103sit\u0103 noua fizic\u0103, iar colegii lor din domeniul dezvolt\u0103rii teoriei nu sunt de niciun ajutor<\/strong>.&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8222;&#8230;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/supersymmetry-and-the-crisis-in-physics\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Unele<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.edge.org\/response-detail\/23857\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">au<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1710.07663\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">numit<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/aeon.co\/essays\/has-the-quest-for-top-down-unification-of-physics-stalled\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ea \u0219i<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.edge.org\/response-detail\/23857\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">criz\u0103<\/a>. Dar nu cred c\u0103 \u201ccriz\u0103\u201d descrie bine situa\u021bia actual\u0103:&nbsp;<strong>Criza este at\u00e2t de optimist\u0103<\/strong>. Se creeaz\u0103 impresia c\u0103 teoreticienii \u0219i-au dat seama c\u0103 au gre\u0219it, c\u0103 schimbarea este pe drum, c\u0103 se trezesc acum \u0219i vor abandona metodologia lor gre\u0219it\u0103.&nbsp;<strong>Dar nu v\u0103d nicio trezire. Auto-reflec\u021bia \u00een comunitate este zero, zero, nada, nichts, nul\u0103. Ei continu\u0103 s\u0103 fac\u0103 ceea ce fac de 40 de ani,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1811.04279\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">vorbind despre naturale\u021be<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/find\/grp_physics\/1\/abs:+swampland\/0\/1\/0\/all\/0\/1?skip=0&amp;query_id=be517a579789d22d\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u0219i multiversuri<\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=10604\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u0219i<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1702.05333\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">mut\u00e2ndu-\u0219i \u201epredic\u021biile\u201c, \u00eenc\u0103 o dat\u0103, la urm\u0103toarea&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1711.10225\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">coliziune de particule mai mare<\/a><\/strong>.&nbsp;<strong>Cred c\u0103 stagnarea o descrie mai bine<\/strong>. \u0218i permite\u021bi-mi s\u0103 precizez c\u0103 problema acestei stagn\u0103ri nu este legat\u0103 de experimente. Problema este reprezentat\u0103 de o mul\u021bime de predic\u021bii gre\u0219ite ale fizicienilor teoreticieni.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e...\u0218tim acest lucru at\u00e2t pentru c\u0103 materia \u00eentunecat\u0103 este doar un loc pentru ceva ce nu \u00een\u021belegem, c\u00e2t \u0219i pentru c\u0103 formularea matematic\u0103 a fizicii particulelor este incompatibil\u0103 cu matematica pe care o folosim pentru gravita\u021bie.&nbsp;<strong>Fizicienii \u0219tiau despre aceste dou\u0103 probleme \u00eenc\u0103 din anii 1930. \u0218i, p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een anii 1970, au f\u0103cut mari progrese<\/strong>.&nbsp;<strong>Dar de atunci, dezvoltarea teoriei \u00een bazele fizicii a stagnat<\/strong>. Dac\u0103 experimentele descoper\u0103 ceva nou acum, acest lucru se va \u00eent\u00e2mpla \u00een ciuda, nu din cauza, a zece mii de predic\u021bii gre\u0219ite.&nbsp;<strong>Zece mii de previziuni gre\u0219ite sun\u0103 dramatic, dar este de fapt o subestimare<\/strong>. Rezum doar predic\u021biile care au fost f\u0103cute pentru fizica dincolo de modelul standard pe care Large Hadron Collider (LHC) ar fi trebuit s\u0103 le g\u0103seasc\u0103: toate dimensiunile suplimentare \u00een multiplele lor forme \u0219i configura\u021bii, toate grupurile de simetrie frumoase, toate particulele noi cu nume fanteziste. Pute\u021bi estima num\u0103rul total de astfel de predic\u021bii num\u0103r\u00e2nd articolele sau, alternativ, oamenii care lucreaz\u0103 \u00een domeniile respective \u0219i productivitatea lor medie.&nbsp;<strong>Toate au fost gre\u0219ite<\/strong>. Chiar dac\u0103 LHC descoper\u0103 ceva nou \u00een datele care urmeaz\u0103 s\u0103 vin\u0103, \u0219tim deja c\u0103 presupunerile teoreticienilor nu au func\u021bionat.&nbsp;<strong>Nu. Un. singur. Unu<\/strong>. De c\u00e2te dovezi mai au nevoie c\u0103 metodele lor nu func\u021bioneaz\u0103?&nbsp;<strong>Aceast\u0103 faz\u0103 lung\u0103 de lips\u0103 de progres este f\u0103r\u0103 precedent<\/strong>. Da, au trecut cam dou\u0103 mii de ani de la prima presupunere a lui Democrit despre atomi p\u00e2n\u0103 la detectarea lor efectiv\u0103, dar asta pentru c\u0103 \u00een cea mai mare parte a acestor dou\u0103 mii de ani oamenii au avut alte lucruri de f\u0103cut dec\u00e2t s\u0103 contemple structura materiei elementare. Cum ar fi, de exemplu, cum s\u0103 construie\u0219ti case care s\u0103 nu se pr\u0103bu\u0219easc\u0103 peste tine. Din acest motiv, citarea timpului cronologic este lipsit\u0103 de sens. Ar trebui s\u0103 ne uit\u0103m mai bine la timpul real de lucru al fizicienilor.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e...Conform datelor privind membrii Societ\u0103\u021bii Americane de Fizic\u0103 \u0219i ai Societ\u0103\u021bii Germane de Fizic\u0103&nbsp;<strong>num\u0103rul total de fizicieni a crescut de aproximativ 100 de ori \u00eentre anii 1900 \u0219i 2000<\/strong>.*&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/backreaction.blogspot.com\/2013\/05\/what-do-most-physicists-work-on.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Majoritatea acestor fizicieni nu lucreaz\u0103 \u00een bazele fizicii<\/a>. Dar \u00een ceea ce prive\u0219te activitatea de publicare, diferitele subdomenii ale fizicii cresc \u00een ritmuri aproximativ comparabile. Acum, de dragul simplit\u0103\u021bii, s\u0103 presupunem c\u0103 fizicienii de ast\u0103zi lucreaz\u0103 la fel de multe ore pe s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2n\u0103 ca acum 100 de ani - detaliile nu conteaz\u0103 prea mult, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 cre\u0219terea este exponen\u021bial\u0103. Atunci ne putem \u00eentreba: c\u00e2t timp de lucru \u00eencep\u00e2nd de ast\u0103zi corespunde, s\u0103 zicem, unui timp de lucru de 40 de ani \u00eencep\u00e2nd de acum 100 de ani. Ghici\u021bi! R\u0103spuns: aproximativ 14 luni.&nbsp;<strong>\u021ain\u00e2nd cont doar de orele de lucru, fizicienii de ast\u0103zi ar trebui s\u0103 poat\u0103 face \u00een 14 luni ceea ce cu un secol \u00eenainte le lua 40 de ani<\/strong>.&#8220;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201e...Dezvoltarea de noi metodologii este mai dificil\u0103 dec\u00e2t inventarea de noi particule \u00een zeci, motiv pentru care nu le place s\u0103 aud\u0103 concluziile mele. Orice schimbare va reduce produc\u021bia de h\u00e2rtie, iar ei nu doresc acest lucru. Nu presiunea institu\u021bional\u0103 este cea care creeaz\u0103 aceast\u0103 rezisten\u021b\u0103, ci faptul c\u0103&nbsp;<strong>oamenii de \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 \u00een\u0219i\u0219i nu vor s\u0103-\u0219i mi\u0219te fundul. C\u00e2t timp pot continua cu asta, v\u0103 \u00eentreba\u021bi? M\u0103 tem c\u0103 nimic nu-i poate opri. \u00ce\u0219i analizeaz\u0103 reciproc lucr\u0103rile. \u00ce\u0219i analizeaz\u0103 reciproc propunerile de finan\u021bare. \u0218i \u00ee\u0219i spun \u00een mod constant c\u0103 ceea ce fac este o \u0219tiin\u021b\u0103 bun\u0103. De ce ar trebui s\u0103 se opreasc\u0103? Pentru ei, totul merge bine. Organizeaz\u0103 conferin\u021be, public\u0103 lucr\u0103ri, discut\u0103 despre noile lor idei extraordinare<\/strong>. Din interior, lucrurile par s\u0103 mearg\u0103 ca de obicei, doar c\u0103 nu iese nimic din ele.&nbsp;<strong>Aceasta nu este o problem\u0103 care va disp\u0103rea de la sine<\/strong>.&#8220;\n\n<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is a recurring theme that Peat has addressed many times in his articles and interviews, albeit focusing usually on medical fraud. However, the problem is essentially identical in virtually all of fundamental scientific disciplines. The sad reality is that despite exponentially increased funding for R&amp;D in the 20th century, most of it has been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","advgb_blocks_editor_width":"","advgb_blocks_columns_visual_guide":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[850,852,854,853,851],"tags":[849,183,855],"class_list":["post-7622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-haidut","category-idealabs-en","category-idealabsdc","category-raypeat","category-science","tag-haidut-2","tag-idealabs","tag-raypeat"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress - \u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/stiinta-stagneaza-niciun-progres-de-la-inceputul-secolului-al-xx-lea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress - \u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This is a recurring theme that Peat has addressed many times in his articles and interviews, albeit focusing usually on medical fraud. However, the problem is essentially identical in virtually all of fundamental scientific disciplines. The sad reality is that despite exponentially increased funding for R&amp;D in the 20th century, most of it has been [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/stiinta-stagneaza-niciun-progres-de-la-inceputul-secolului-al-xx-lea\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"\u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/xenobg\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0\"},\"headline\":\"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2248,\"keywords\":[\"haidut\",\"IdeaLabs\",\"raypeat\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Haidut\",\"Idealabs\",\"Idealabsdc\",\"RayPeat\",\"Science\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/\",\"name\":\"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress - \u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"\u041d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u043e\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439\",\"description\":\"\u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439 \u0441 \u0412\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043b\u0438\u043d \u0438 IdeaLabs \u0438 LSlabs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0\",\"name\":\"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/xenobg.com\\\/ro\\\/author\\\/xenobg\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u0218tiin\u021ba stagneaz\u0103! De la \u00eenceputul secolului XX nu exist\u0103 niciun progres real - Sim\u021bi, g\u00e2nde\u0219te, ac\u021bioneaz\u0103","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/stiinta-stagneaza-niciun-progres-de-la-inceputul-secolului-al-xx-lea\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress - \u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439","og_description":"This is a recurring theme that Peat has addressed many times in his articles and interviews, albeit focusing usually on medical fraud. However, the problem is essentially identical in virtually all of fundamental scientific disciplines. The sad reality is that despite exponentially increased funding for R&amp;D in the 20th century, most of it has been [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/stiinta-stagneaza-niciun-progres-de-la-inceputul-secolului-al-xx-lea\/","og_site_name":"\u0423\u0441\u0435\u0442\u0438, \u043c\u0438\u0441\u043b\u0438, \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0430\u0439","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/xenobg","article_published_time":"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00","author":"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d","Timp estimat pentru citire":"11 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/"},"author":{"name":"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/#\/schema\/person\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0"},"headline":"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress","datePublished":"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/"},"wordCount":2248,"keywords":["haidut","IdeaLabs","raypeat"],"articleSection":["Haidut","Idealabs","Idealabsdc","RayPeat","Science"],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/","url":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/","name":"\u0218tiin\u021ba stagneaz\u0103! De la \u00eenceputul secolului XX nu exist\u0103 niciun progres real - Sim\u021bi, g\u00e2nde\u0219te, ac\u021bioneaz\u0103","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-12-08T15:45:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-09T17:32:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/#\/schema\/person\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/science-is-stagnant-no-progress-since-early-20th-century\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"\u041d\u0430\u0447\u0430\u043b\u043e","item":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Science Is Stagnant! Since Early twentieth Century there is no real Progress"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/","name":"Sim\u021bi\u021bi, g\u00e2ndi\u021bi, ac\u021biona\u021bi","description":"Simte, g\u00e2nde\u0219te, ac\u021bioneaz\u0103 cu Veselin \u0219i IdeaLabs \u0219i LSlabs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/#\/schema\/person\/73533c05ea5a71c6062caaab75d737e0","name":"Khaidutin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8b1215eb0750ccd786b177586445c9d7f806cb30bf775a2d539d8a574ee17b26?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d"},"url":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/author\/xenobg\/"}]}},"author_meta":{"display_name":"\u0425\u0430\u0439\u0434\u0443\u0442\u0438\u043d","author_link":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/author\/xenobg\/"},"featured_img":null,"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","coauthors":[],"tax_additional":{"categories":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/haidut\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Haidut<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/idealabs-en\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Idealabs<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/idealabsdc\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Idealabsdc<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/raypeat\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">RayPeat<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/science\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Science<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Haidut<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Idealabs<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Idealabsdc<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">RayPeat<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">Science<\/span>"]},"tags":{"linked":["<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/science\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">haidut<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/science\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">IdeaLabs<\/a>","<a href=\"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/category\/science\/\" class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">raypeat<\/a>"],"unlinked":["<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">haidut<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">IdeaLabs<\/span>","<span class=\"advgb-post-tax-term\">raypeat<\/span>"]}},"comment_count":0,"relative_dates":{"created":"Posted 7 ani ago","modified":"Updated 7 ani ago"},"absolute_dates":{"created":"Posted on 08.12.2018","modified":"Updated on 09.12.2018"},"absolute_dates_time":{"created":"Posted on 08.12.2018 5:45 pm","modified":"Updated on 09.12.2018 7:32 pm"},"featured_img_caption":"","series_order":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xenobg.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}